• Xfx Radeon Hd 4350 Drivers For Mac

    Xfx Radeon Hd 4350 Drivers For Mac

    The installation is plug n play, as with any mac video card. If you buy the 4870, there are instructions on how to install in the documentation included with in the box. As long as you have 10.5.7 on, you'll be fine with the drivers. I am using Asus ATI 4350 1 GB card. When you installed the osx in your PC, what your recomend for customization part? I have i5 hd 2500.

    The 3,1 Mac Pro (Early 2008) has a double wide PCI Express slot and does have the slots to support this card. There are also two power booster cable connectors on the main board to support a dual card installation, however there is only one 16 lane slot and that is the double wide one, the second is 8 lane, the remaining two are 4 lane.

    This card is defined by Apple as requiring a PCI Express 2.0 slot which also matches the 3,1 Mac Pro spec. Physically, there appears to be no reason the card will not work. Answered by Alwyn S from Chapel Hill. Gran turismo 4 pcsx2 download for mac. Aug 10, 2010. BK from Capella's 'Best Answer' for this question is inaccurate.

    The ATI Radeon HD 5770 and 5870 will work in any model Mac Pro with up to 3 displays. I and well as several other websites have tested this. You must follow the 'guidelines' of the card to use all three displays. See Apple Knowledge Base article HT4279 by going to support.apple.com and entering HT4279 in the search bubble.

    It will explain how to use up to 3 displays with these cards. Answered by Peter B from Findlay. Nov 11, 2010. I have a Early 2008 Mac Pro (3,1) and the official line form the Apple Genius Bar in Sydney was 'no, it won't work'.

    This was what two other resellers told me, however Other World Computing in the US has an article about testing for exactly this question and it gave me confidence to order the upgrade card & new monitor. I installed both this morning and am happily using both the 27' MiniDisplayport and my old 23' DVI monitors without a problem. Answered by Maclaren N from Hudson Falls.

    Oct 26, 2010. Actually to correct an incorrect post, BOTH the 5770 AND the 5870 (Apple Cards) work in the Mac Pro 1,1 according to Rob-ART over at BareFeats. That's verified. Not saying there aren't specific instructions prior to 10.6.5, but they both work.

    The 5870 does NOT use an EFI64 ROM, so no worries. Not the one Apple carries, nor the ones we must not speak about. The real issue that I'm interested to see would be benchmarks between the 5770 and the 5870 in a Mac Pro 1,1. Barefeats did a review on the 2008 Mac Pro 3,1 with several cards and with a resounding YES, the 5870 was worth the extra money. However, it's been speculated that due to memory bandwidth constraints and other structural issues, that the 5870 would yield only about a 5% benefit over the 5770 if that in real world applications. I have my doubts which is why I'm really hoping to see some specific benchmarks showing the Mac Pro 1,1 and the 4870, 5770 and the 5870 along with the X1900 as a reference since many if not most of the upgraders will be upgrading from that card (probably should add the 3870 as well). The Mac Pro 1,1 is and has been a fantastic machine and either of these cards will be a significant upgrade and welcome upgrade.

    Answered by William K from Ellenton. Oct 31, 2010. Yes, I just replaced my original graphics card in my early 2008 Mac Pro with the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and it works beautifully with a better image than before.

    It was easy to replace. I am a 70 year old woman who has never worked on the inside of my computers. This was the first time and I had no problem at all. Instructions were clear and I used all anti-static safety recommendations. Great confidence building experience.

    I also took the opportunity to blow all the accumulated dust out of my computer, and now I will keep it clean on a regular basis. Answered by Suzanne B from Henderson. Mar 24, 2012.

    I have successfully installed the 5770 in my Mac Pro 3.1 but not without some interesting issues. The one I purchased required auxillary power and since it wasn't designed for a 3.1 Mac Pro I had to go hunting for the connector on the logic board. Found it near the front of the board just underneath the plastic slot holders and between the wireless adapter (if you have one) and the additional SATA connectors. Once plugged it it worked fine. However since I have 5x 2 TB drives installed, 1 SSD drive, one DVD drive and now 3 graphics cards (5770 and 2x 2600s), it hit the max of the power supply and some of my USB ports stopped working. Will likely take out one of the 2600s but for now it is working fine if I just unplug a device until after it boots.

    Answered by Peter F from Milton. Nov 13, 2011. Just upgraded my mac pro 3.1 with the ati radeon 5770 today. I was experiencing issues with my older ati card, and had to find a replacement. Spoke to a (somewhat lacking, not-nearly genius at an apple store), and a pretty insightful person on tech support, and visiting this and many other forums, it was pretty unclear if this card would work in my mac pro at all. Finally, i decided to just take the plunge and try it. First though, i thought i'd save some money and try the standard version from best buy.

    Did this with the radeon 5770 as well as the nvidia gts 450. Needless to say, they didn't work. No drivers, or the apple power supply hardware for the card(s) were different than those provided in the standard versions.

    After spending the entire weekend with multiple runs to best buy (by the way, no one there really has any idea what going on), i went to the sf apple store, and picked up the mac version of the radeon 5770. Popped it in, and it works perfectly. Super easy and super silent. The standard 5770 version wasn't powered properly or something, so the fan was unusually loud. I hated dealing with what appeared as though everything needs to be the 'latest and greatest' from apple, as well as that notion really confusing their less than informed staff, and ultimately paying the extra cash for a specific power supply wire, but i got piece of mind that it works, and that it does. Answered by Danh G from San Francisco.

    Feb 13, 2011.

    In the last couple of days, I was rewriting ATI support in Chameleon, and had a few testers, but I need to make sure it works on most supported cards. First I would like to outline a few things:. This isn't a HOW TO get your card working, this is a request for testing. Don't ask how to install the booter, how to use or add a given booter flag or how to run an update, if you don't know how to do that yourself, then this isn't for you, yet, learn that elsewhere, and you're more than welcome here. I don't take responsibility for any damage this may cause, so take your precautions before you use this. Requirements:. An ATI Radeon HD6xxx, HD5xxx or HD4xxx card.

    Latest Snow Leopard with the latest Graphics update. How and what to report:.

    Disable any kind of enabler, injector or device-properties you're currently using. Test every port, and any possible combination; test each port alone, then two ports, then three. Etc, to the best you're capable of. Post the output from: sudo lspci -nnvd 0x1002: grep -B2 Subsystem. Save an ioreg dump (Save from the File menu of IORegistryExplorer) each time you try a different port and/or combination. Report any observations or comments. Include a screenshot of the Graphics tab from System Profiler when reporting.

    Multi-Display on Evergreen (Radeon HD5000 series): Check out this wikipedia for more information. This booter has a new key; ' AtiFb' ' AtiConfig', if one would like to try a different framebuffer outputs and card configs. Thanks: To Trauma who started adding HD5xxx support, and to FKA (FormerlyKnownAs), joe75 and tmongkol for their great feedback.

    To ^Andy^ for his efforts on the HD6xxx support. Changes: - ' AtiFb' is now ' AtiConfig' which I think describes better its use. The ROM image under /Extra should be named.rom; Radeon HD5870 Eyefinity6 is 100268980b001002.rom for example.

    New or already existing cards with the correct ' AtiConfig' (thanks to your feedback). Changes: patch commit revision 700 - Added new card config names from the latest ATIFramebuffer.kext. Added few more supported cards. Added ROM Revision info. (untested) - Replaced VBIOS with ATYbinimage to avoid a conflict with the NVIDIA Enabler. Fixed a logic mistake in getSMBOemProcessorBusSpeed.

    Changes: patch commit revision 785:788 - Added support for a few HD6xxx cards (Thanks ^Andy^). Merged to trunk. No binary for now. @ Kabyl Thank you for this - very impressed.

    Card is ATI R5770 Vapor-X and IOreg attached with Samsung XL2370 connected with DVI and same plus Philips Monitor connected via DVI and another IO Reg with the Philips connected via HDMI. Confirm this is the best yet very stable using default vervet FB.Might be my imagination but the display is noticeably sharper. Also tested FBAti with different frame buffer and that appears to work as well although I appear to get black screens with all but vervet, although still yet to test all. Anybody who is interested my com.apple.boot.list Default Partition hd(0,2) Kernel machkernel Kernel Flags GraphicsEnabler Yes AtiFb Vervet DropSSDT yes Timeout 1 Theme Default2 EthernetBuiltIn No Thanks again. I This booter has a new key; ' AtiFb', if one would like to try a different framebuffer. If the card is not primary, then you need a.rom under /Extra.

    This is awesome! Thank you so much sir! You have done SO much for our community, you are certainly a legend; and your many hours of work are GReaTLy appreciated!!!

    I use two ATI video cards. So the AtiFb key assigns a new FB only to the first video card (lowest PCI address), correct? Do you plan to expand this project to include 'non primary' cards? Just curious. Thanks again! @ Kabyl Thank you for this - very impressed.

    Card is ATI R5770 Vapor-X and IOreg attached with Samsung XL2370 connected with DVI and same plus Philips Monitor connected via DVI and another IO Reg with the Philips connected via HDMI. Confirm this is the best yet very stable using default vervet FB.Might be my imagination but the display is noticeably sharper. Also tested FBAti with different frame buffer and that appears to work as well although I appear to get black screens with all but vervet, although still yet to test all. Anybody who is interested my com.apple.boot.list Default Partition hd(0,2) Kernel machkernel Kernel Flags GraphicsEnabler Yes AtiFb Vervet DropSSDT yes Timeout 1 Theme Default2 EthernetBuiltIn No Thanks again. Brgds/TonyD Thank you, and Vervet is the default for your card, so there is no need to use AtiFb. This is awesome!

    Thank you so much sir! You have done SO much for our community, you are certainly a legend; and your many hours of work are GReaTLy appreciated!!!

    View pic get free fresh version for mac. It will mean you are not wasting cash & time on 10.6 that is only needed for one App store download. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. Apple Footer • This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple may provide or recommend responses as a possible solution based on the information provided; every potential issue may involve several factors not detailed in the conversations captured in an electronic forum and Apple can therefore provide no guarantee as to the efficacy of any proposed solutions on the community forums. I'd consider a trip to an Apple store if you have one local, they may drop an installer or recovery partition onto a memory stick for you.

    I use two ATI video cards. So the AtiFb key assigns a new FB only to the first video card (lowest PCI address), correct? Do you plan to expand this project to include 'non primary' cards?

    Just curious. Thanks again! The same code is run on each card, so AtiFb would be applied to both.

    This key is purely for testing purposes to find the best FB for your card, so you're supposed to test one card at a time, and with the feedback I get, I can pick the right FB for a given card. The same code is run on each card, so AtiFb would be applied to both. This key is purely for testing purposes to find the best FB for your card, so you're supposed to test one card at a time, and with the feedback I get, I can pick the right FB for a given card. Sorry, I misunderstood WHAT exactly you were testing & what information you are ultimately seeking. I will have to run the tests with each card individually (so I can submit my ioreg dumps) while my wife is at work- she doesn't like it when I open the computer when she's home! LOL But I can tell you now that your boot file works fine with my XFX ATI Radeon HD5770 1GB GDDR-5 (DVI, DVI, Display Port, HDMI) with device ID 68b8 which requires Vervet for full support.

    However, my HIS ATI Radeon HD4650 512MB GDDR-3 (DVI, VGA & HDMI) with device ID 9498 requires Motmot as opposed to Peregrine. That is the only way I can get DVI, VGA or HDMI output (all with one framebuffer- there are some weird tricks to getting each one to work, but other framebuffers only allow ONE port to work no matter what).

    I have yet to get more than ONE video/display stream from any 46xx card in OS X, seems to be a limitation with the driver. My 4670 does on the other hand require Peregrine.

    (Device ID 9490). First of all, tyvm! This took me one step further in getting my system to work optimally. I have this setup:, 2 x LG L204WT LCD screens, default framebuffer (Vervet) With the boot files from Mohamed and my own extracted rom, I could not get dual DVI nor DVI+DVI2VGA to work.

    It does work flawlessly now. With the exception of single DVI2VGA only working on the bottom port. 'Hotswapping' the video cables works and 1680x1050 gets detected properly. Attached are the ioreg dump and profiler screenshot with dual DVI connected.

    Sponza Ultra test result is still very slow though: 53 secs. Cinebench 11.5 GPU score is 34 fps. UPDATE: After a while i get static/snow every half second. Going to try another framebuffer. UPDATE 2: It's exactly issue that happens in retail Mac Pros too. So nothing to do with framebuffer I suppose.

    Top+bottom port results (D2V=DVI2VGA): +DVI: works DVI+: works DVI+DVI: works DVI+D2V: works D2V+DVI: works D2V+: no signal +D2V: works. I can tell you the 4650 HD (1 Gb) is having the same problem as using any booter besides RC4 or Asere. Both displays power off as soon as the login window should be loading. It doesn't matter if I use VGA and DVI or VGA and VGA (Using DVI to VGA). Would be happy to give you am ioreg dump bump no one has responded to my earlier question of HOW to get the dump.

    Radeon Hd 4350 Specs

    Download developer tools for IORegistryExplorer. Can also use Linux. Awesome work here with this kabyl, Sorry I unable to try this with 4870x2 (no spare H/D at mo & no DVI input on my monitor to have working baseline). However, my HIS ATI Radeon HD4650 512MB GDDR-3 (DVI, VGA & HDMI) with device ID 9498 requires Motmot as opposed to Peregrine. That is the only way I can get DVI, VGA or HDMI output (all with one framebuffer- there are some weird tricks to getting each one to work, but other framebuffers only allow ONE port to work no matter what). I have yet to get more than ONE video/display stream from any 46xx card in OS X, seems to be a limitation with the driver.

    Ati Hd 4350 Drivers

    My 4670 does on the other hand require Peregrine. (Device ID 9490).

    Xfx Radeon Hd 4350 Drivers For Mac